Strengths and Weaknesses
1st Paper-
Strengths
1. In text citations were done correctly
2. Easy to read and follow along
3. Had evidence to back up statements
Weaknesses
1. paragraphs were very long
2. A ton of information that could have been separated
3. Shouldn't start with a quote
2nd Paper-
Strengths
1. I like how it starts out with informing you about the different types of writing
2. The next paragraph is about what the person he interviewed said
3. Then does a great job saying why its academic and non academic
Weaknesses
1. Could of used a little more information to bulk up the paper
2. I think the word choice in some parts could have been better
3. Didn't use in text citations
3rd Paper-
Strengths
1. They used what a creative writer means to them and other people to start the paper its a good hook
2. Clearly separates who the type of writing refers and the structure they write in (ect)
3. Good in text citations
Weaknesses
1. It doesn't have a sentence to connects the first paragraph to the second one, talking about the academic writing
2. The conclusions doesn't sum up the paper
3. transition sentences
4th Paper-
Strengths
1. They said what most people think of when they hear of that field of study
2. Good reference page
3. Has evidence to back up what he is saying
Weaknesses
1. Work on in text citations
2. Grammer
3. Punctuation
5th Paper-
Strengths
1. Different types of writing
2. Good conclusion
3. Headings
Weaknesses
1. Transition sentences
2. Need to capitalize on in text citations
3. technical terms that the common person would not know
6th Paper-
Strengths
1. Starting with a quote that grabs attention of the reader
2. Headings
3. Gives good examples
Weaknesses
1. Images that the reader wouldn't know what it is
2. Better conclusion that ties the paper together and hits the man points of it
3. Interview someone from that field
Strengths
1. In text citations were done correctly
2. Easy to read and follow along
3. Had evidence to back up statements
Weaknesses
1. paragraphs were very long
2. A ton of information that could have been separated
3. Shouldn't start with a quote
2nd Paper-
Strengths
1. I like how it starts out with informing you about the different types of writing
2. The next paragraph is about what the person he interviewed said
3. Then does a great job saying why its academic and non academic
Weaknesses
1. Could of used a little more information to bulk up the paper
2. I think the word choice in some parts could have been better
3. Didn't use in text citations
3rd Paper-
Strengths
1. They used what a creative writer means to them and other people to start the paper its a good hook
2. Clearly separates who the type of writing refers and the structure they write in (ect)
3. Good in text citations
Weaknesses
1. It doesn't have a sentence to connects the first paragraph to the second one, talking about the academic writing
2. The conclusions doesn't sum up the paper
3. transition sentences
4th Paper-
Strengths
1. They said what most people think of when they hear of that field of study
2. Good reference page
3. Has evidence to back up what he is saying
Weaknesses
1. Work on in text citations
2. Grammer
3. Punctuation
5th Paper-
Strengths
1. Different types of writing
2. Good conclusion
3. Headings
Weaknesses
1. Transition sentences
2. Need to capitalize on in text citations
3. technical terms that the common person would not know
6th Paper-
Strengths
1. Starting with a quote that grabs attention of the reader
2. Headings
3. Gives good examples
Weaknesses
1. Images that the reader wouldn't know what it is
2. Better conclusion that ties the paper together and hits the man points of it
3. Interview someone from that field
Comments
Post a Comment