IMRad differences

This type of paper is different then an argument based research paper because you have to do an experiment on your certain topic. You will prepare a report on what you experimented. In this type of paper you are not trying to argue that your point in correct you will use evidence to prove your point. It is based on factual information that you gather. You should put a table in our report it is not as formal as a normal essay would be. You should begin with an abstract. You will not end with a conclusion like other papers. The format of this paper is very different to a argumentative paper. This type of paper is based off of research and interviewing and taking polls from random people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Sources

https://www.britannica.com/technology/engineering This article gives the background information about engineering. The article says what it takes to be an engineer and how to problem solve. This article always has some research to back up there information. Half of the article is academic and the other half is non-academic. It is written from the perspective of someone that knows about engineering. The article has very easy language to understand and uses words that most people know. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Students-And-Educators/Engineering-Careers/What-Is-Engineering This article tells you about the different types of engineering, most people might not know that there is more then one type. It is information that most people don't know about. This article is most likely written for people who already have the understanding of certain types of engineering. This article is academic and written by someone that has a clear understanding of the difference betw...
Read more

analysis of proposals

a strength on the first paper is that they give you numbers so you can get a better understanding of what books actually cost. put evidence to how the government is trying to fix that. a weakness is that the sentences are choppy and they don't really flow. the second paper they clearly state the problem, the solution ect. so its easy to follow and understand. they use numbers that make us see what the problem actually is. I think that a weakness might be that she just needs to balance out every topic she keeps it short and sweet on the problem and solution but the justification part is longer then the rest. again the third paper uses number and scientific facts to prove the point. I think that with this one it doesn't clearly say what is what we have to figure out what the problem is and it should be easy to understand and know right away that that is the problem. I think that the meal plan one was the best i relate to that that is something I would like to change. Her proposal...
Read more

Topic Proposal Speech #2

the topic that I am picking is allowing people under the age of 21 to be in bars after 10 without getting in trouble. By doing that it will limit the amount of tickets that are given. Most people in a college town that are in the bars aren't 21. Every other country has the legal drinking age of 18 besides the United States.
Read more